<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could OpenID be Our Savior to the Social Network Blues?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/</link>
	<description>examine your mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-8860</link>
		<dc:creator>Idetrorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/#comment-8860</guid>
		<description>very interesting, but I don&#039;t agree with you 
Idetrorce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don't agree with you<br />
Idetrorce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-4134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/#comment-4134</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, big social networks have less of an incentive to embrace this than emerging ones... but yeah, this could be big if some of the medium-to-large players in the arena adopted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, big social networks have less of an incentive to embrace this than emerging ones&#8230; but yeah, this could be big if some of the medium-to-large players in the arena adopted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fox</title>
		<link>http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-4124</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/#comment-4124</guid>
		<description>Well the short answer is Yes!  JoeC has the right idea with your &#039;friends&#039; being stored on your OpenID provider.  

[...]The longer answer is that with the attribute exchange feature in the soon to be released OpenID 2.0 spec you can specify custom fields for your online persona. For example a â€˜friendsâ€™ field could be populated with a list of the OpenID accounts for your family, friends, and professional network. This field, if requested from a relying party (Social Network Site X) could then be passed on and automatically populate your network. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the short answer is Yes!  JoeC has the right idea with your 'friends' being stored on your OpenID provider.  </p>
<p>[...]The longer answer is that with the attribute exchange feature in the soon to be released OpenID 2.0 spec you can specify custom fields for your online persona. For example a â€˜friendsâ€™ field could be populated with a list of the OpenID accounts for your family, friends, and professional network. This field, if requested from a relying party (Social Network Site X) could then be passed on and automatically populate your network. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeC</title>
		<link>http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>I agree completely. This would allow you carry your friends&#039; OpenIds with you wherever you go. Then each social networking site can simply import them, and you can control your OpenId &quot;friends&quot; on your ID provider. Sweet!!

JoeC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely. This would allow you carry your friends' OpenIds with you wherever you go. Then each social networking site can simply import them, and you can control your OpenId "friends" on your ID provider. Sweet!!</p>
<p>JoeC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetIDme Supports OpenID &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NetIDme &#62; OpenID Growing In Popularity</title>
		<link>http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/comment-page-1/#comment-3211</link>
		<dc:creator>NetIDme Supports OpenID &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NetIDme &#62; OpenID Growing In Popularity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ewherrmann.com/2007/07/02/could-openid-be-our-savior-to-the-social-network-blues/#comment-3211</guid>
		<description>[...] OpenID seems to beÂ increasing in popularity, as adoption and support grows. Check out this good article: Could OpenID be Our Savior to the Social Network Blues?Â on the benefits that OpenID can bring to social websites. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OpenID seems to beÂ increasing in popularity, as adoption and support grows. Check out this good article: Could OpenID be Our Savior to the Social Network Blues?Â on the benefits that OpenID can bring to social websites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

